When Two out of Three Won't be Good Enough

 When Two out of Three Won't be Good Enough

The implications of sustainability and the triple bottom line for policy and corporate governance for public administrators, within the three levels of government in Queensland.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An exploratory analysis into measuring business contributions to sustainable development in Australia.

  An exploratory analysis into measuring business contributions to sustainable development in Australia. Abstract The aim of the research in this dissertation is twofold. First, from a wide ranging survey of the themes, principles and approaches to sustainable development, the objective is to establish a method of measuring whether or not business and industry are contributing to sustainable development. The second objective is to then use this method of measurement (called the Business Sustainable Development Index [BSDI]) to evaluate the contribution to sustainable development of selected Australian firms. The three pillars approach to sustainable development and the capitals theory approach to its measurement are the theoretical bases for the measurement framework developed in this research (Elkington 1999; Figge and Hahn 2002; Faucheux and Muir 1997). The study is grounded on the proposition that in a business setting 'what you don't measure you can't manage'. Howev...
Read more
  An Amateur’s Analysis of the New Introduction to TECHNICS AND TIME, 4 [Faculties and Functions of Noesis in the Post Truth Age ] By Bernard Stiegler [Translated by Daniel Ross]    LINK TO FULL ARTICLE ABSTRACT It takes time to embrace a new or changed way of ‘seeing’ the world - especially if it is a perspective  that spans from personal experience to the Milky Way and in the process goes back towards pre-history and out towards a possible future. Bernard Steigler’s oeuvre really lays out such a perspective [with each particular work providing a different angle or view on his outlook] and this brief note  is intended to trace the movement in thoughts and ideas countenanced in Bernard Steigler’s latest [English translated] world view. This analysis simply looks at the “New Introduction”  to the  recently published [English version] Technics and Time 4. Much appreciation must go to Daniel Ross, Australian scholar and translator, who has provided such a...
Read more

A Review of Bernard Stiegler’s article “The Proletarianisation of Sensibility”

  A Review of Bernard Stiegler’s article “The Proletarianisation of Sensibility” Prepared by Dr Neil Peach ABSTRACT Stiegler’s article “The Proletarianisation of Sensibility” translated by Anne De Boever and published by Duke University in 2017  provides interesting insights into his analysis of the foundations of human sensibility as well as the epochal implications of developments in contemporary art in the 20th century. In essence,  Stiegler proposes that there is now a general regime of reproduction [incorporating both work and art]  comprising “a new totality of tertiary  retentions” and that contemporary artistic sensibility and aesthetics are constituent of a “general organology”.  Stiegler’s overall philosophy often refers to the process of proletarianisation as the means through which humans lose knowledge. It can apply to all  areas of human activity - work, art, music, day-to-day encounters. It flows from mans’ tendency to employ technics an...
Read more